FanCasts

Sit back, relax and listen to our FREE Football Podcasts. Subscribe 4 FREE to get your teams show each week.

Blogs

Intelligent, articulate, opinion. Read, rate and comment!

Banter

Create your own discussion and debate - Sign up and get involved!
Tagged: Arsenal

Football FanCast columnist Billy Pearson looks at the departure of Mathieu Flamini and wonders if Arsene Wenger found himself caught between a rock and a hard place back in January.

Arsene Wenger must look back to January 2008 with about as much fondness as you would on hearing news of a dead relative. A combination of wrong decisions, broken promises and player power has constituted in a downturn of fortunes and surrender our hope of honours this season and has left some sections of the Arsenal faithful questioning the wisdom of the ‘professor'.

I don't think there is anyone more annoyed than Arsene Wenger that he didn't splash out in January. Sitting top of the League and comfortable in all other competitions, you could possibly see why Wenger felt reluctant to spend. Maybe he should have foreseen that we were going to suffer an injury crisis that tore our season apart but as they say, hindsight is a wonderful thing.

There is clearly one moment in January that must really wrangle with Wenger and no doubt it will be something that will come out in the weeks ahead. The Frenchman came out in the newspapers yesterday and claimed he felt a little let down and disappointed by Mathieu Flamini in light of his move to AC Milan. Wenger clearly thought that he was going to stay, which forced his hand to offload the unhappy Diarra to Portsmouth. It was a calculated risk by Wenger, given that Flamini was in the final year of his contract, but you kind of feel that Arsene must have had some assurances and it has really backfired on him.

Lassana Diarra is an excellent footballer and was undoubtedly brought in to fulfil the holding role in midfield. The problem Wenger had was the upturn of form of Flamini who along with Fabregas were setting the Premier League alight, what was the manager to do? It seems like Arsene was caught between a rock and a hard place as the player was showing remarkable form and keeping them at the top of the table while refusing to sign a new deal - imagine the uproar that would have taken place had Wenger dropped Flamini and brought in Diarra and the club suffered as a result.

I think the problem with Arsene Wenger is that he has always been a man of his word and the epitome of loyalty. When you are of that persona, you feel that other people share your own values and it's clear that on this particular occasion that Wenger was let down by Flamini. You really do wonder if the player had any intention of staying and what may have been said in January to assure Arsene, and force his hand to let Diarra leave.

Who should be brought in to replace Flamini? Is it time for Diaby to step up? Would you rather see Wenger bring in a Gareth Barry or a Michael Johnson?

Poll:

  • Average: 5 (1 vote)
Clockend Lloydie
Picture of Clockend Lloydie
Interestingly, no one ever
Interestingly, no one ever mentions what - in my humble opinion - led to Flamini's departure. Do you remember the amazing part Flamini played in getting Arsenal to the Champions League final. He played left back whilst The Son Of Satan (Cashly Tweedy) was injured and as soon as TSOS was fit again, he played him in the CL Final. This must have deeply rankled with the Flamster. Understandably so! I can see why Wenger did it, but it could not have helped Flamini feel truly wanted. This is why I don't feel let down by the Flamster. Wenger messed up by not telling Diarra he was under contract to us and loaning him out to Portsmouth. Wenger has too much on his plate and desperately needs someone to sort out player purchases and contracts. Diaby was shaping to be the ideal replacement for Vieira until some useless oaf at Sunderland mangled his leg and set Diaby back by an entire season. Once he is restored to his natural CM role, he'll blossom. Be sure of it.

G00ner P
Picture of G00ner P
I disagree that Diaby is a
I disagree that Diaby is a natural replacement for Viera. He is an attack minded CM player who would offer little protection for the back four and would be a suicidile choice to partner Fab given the amount of pressure our style of play invites on our defence. My view is that AW should go out to the market and buy a replacement with experience of CL and top flight domestic football, however I fear that he is sizing up Song (who has impressed me of late at CB) as his defensive option in the middle of the park. It would do nothing for our chances of winning major trOphies to have a midfield pair with and average age of 20. On the point re Flamini, I fully agree and can't argue with him leaving. We couldn't match Milan's or Juve's offers and therefore the true market value of the player. This situation highlights the drawbacks of a regimented wage structure.

N5
Picture of N5
I feel he made the right
I feel he made the right decision at the time in offloading Diarra, if the player must have realised that why Flam had not signed up he still had a chance. He cant be that smart becuase he has left for Portsmouth and now is likely to join the spuds - great career move.

timao
Picture of timao
Clockend, you are spot on.
Clockend, you are spot on. And Flamini did enough that season to earn a long-term contract. But who's to say that this would have led Flamini to develop into the player he is now. They do say that disappointments and adversity make for a better player don't they?

rizal
Picture of rizal
Good insight I have to say.
Good insight I have to say.

KAYO B URGESS
Picture of KAYO B URGESS
NO WAY is Diaby a flamster
NO WAY is Diaby a flamster replacement... he is an attacking midfielder with the ability to hold the ball and create chances. If he is to play alongside Fabregas, it will by no means be a defensive role. With that in mind, Wenger must buy a strong and competent defender to bolster his back line. Toure is imply not good enough. He does not have the height, awareness or ability to deal with long balls, pace and width. Gallas on the other hand should remain where he is for now... as he is strong. I would like to see Robinho, Villa, Ben Arfa and Zapata come to Arsenal.... I know its a big ask, but I would be happy with two of those....

gooner4life
Picture of gooner4life
veloso as flamsters
veloso as flamsters replacement. Cant see anyone else. Ben arfa on the left and the cb spot should go to micah richards All three would b costly additions around 40mil in total but worth it

mark
Picture of mark
There has been dramatic
There has been dramatic instbility for the past 3 years but unlike other dodgy defences in the premiership Arsenal have an offensive and mid-passing unit that actually protects them defensively by simply keeping the ball for long periods. In general arsenal rarely have to defend as a unit. it can be seen therefore that as soon as we lose possession trouble emerges. sometimes out of nothing. Gallas(a defender wearing number 10 - I ask u is this the mentality of a serious defender...shirt numbers mean a lot to players),toure,senderos,song... these players cannot be defensively compared to the likes of adams,campbell,ferdinand,vidic since their attacking qualities negates some of their defensive brilliance. Watch how the ball bobbles about sometimes its like watch a striker deal with those sorts of situations. Wenger must do something about this.

AW's Arsenal
Picture of AW's Arsenal
I'm a big supporter of
I'm a big supporter of Diaby. I think he's fully capable of filling in for Flamini. He has way more skill - better technique, control, passing and a really good shot - he just needs show more intensity. He looks lost on the wing and often floats into the middle of the park. I can't comment on his potential chemistry with Cesc, but I think assigned a holding role, he could add even more dimension to Arsenal's flowing game while still providing the coverage the back 4 require. Let us not forget Flamini gave up a ton of reckless fouls because the bulk of his game was based on simply hounding the opposition non-stop.